Post #2167054
2025-11-21 22:23 UTC
Replies (7)
-
@tonwood@mathstodon.xyz 2025-11-23 08:25
@andrewt@mathstodon.xyz Now I want to see the simplest impossible system. The Borromean link cannot have plane circles; but that would be a strange thing to call a polycule.
-
@koalou@lgbtqia.space 2025-12-08 07:05
@andrewt@mathstodon.xyz Or for when you date several alters from the same system ๐ค๐คญ (which don't all date the same alters from other systems in the polycule, which makes the polycule idea even more complicated ๐)
-
@arichtman@eigenmagic.net 2025-12-08 09:56
@andrewt@mathstodon.xyz the *second*-hardest polycule problem, after scheduling of course
-
@sodiboo@gaysex.cloud 2025-12-08 10:02
@andrewt@mathstodon.xyz can't arbitrary links be made relatively trivially? e.g. by threading one string into a tangled mess, crossing under the partner, and then exiting all the way back out without crossing under anyone else. repeat indefinitely. I would intuit that there is no polycule that is "mathematically impossible" to represent here, and it's purely a skill issue on the jeweler's end. maybe, with some given size, material, and budget constraints, then certain configurations might be physically infeasible. but certainly not mathematically impossible.
-
@tofu@is-a.cat 2025-12-08 11:58
@andrewt@mathstodon.xyz are these somehow fused together, or just a bunch of rings hanging on a chain and rotating, making names potentially hidden by other rings?
-
@sunshine@kinkycats.org 2025-12-08 12:14
@andrewt@mathstodon.xyz great idea ๐
-
@piersb@wandering.shop 2025-12-08 12:24
@andrewt@mathstodon.xyz I totally read it as polycule gift.