Post #2116412
2026-04-07 14:59 UTC
@kittylyst
Oh, OK. TBH, I was suggesting that it was an April fool, but apparently not.
Replies (1)
-
@kittylyst@mastodon.social 2026-04-07 17:33
@only_ohm I was deliberately avoiding publishing it with a 1st April date for this reason. I also don't seem to be doing well at explaining how necessary it is for criticism of LLM-based technologies to come with actual, technically-grounded receipts. I have now seen several examples of where a refusal to engage is leading to acceptance of pro-LLM views by default, even when all the proponents have is effectively a shitty Gish Gallop.