Post #2116413

@only_ohm I was deliberately avoiding publishing it with a 1st April date for this reason. I also don't seem to be doing well at explaining how necessary it is for criticism of LLM-based technologies to come with actual, technically-grounded receipts. I have now seen several examples of where a refusal to engage is leading to acceptance of pro-LLM views by default, even when all the proponents have is effectively a shitty Gish Gallop.