@scrubbles@poptalk.scrubbles.tech
Post #2107241
2026-05-05 00:48 UTC
Replies (3)
-
@otter@lemmy.ca 2026-05-05 02:37
I didn’t catch the previous post and gave it a quick skim now. My thoughts are more to do with how LLM based moderation is viewed by users. It’s not a new thing, since sentiment analysis based moderation has been around for a long while. Where it becomes a problem is The sentiment analysis makes mistakes and it gets tedious to deal with platforms that use it for automated moderation. This is a big problem with old social media platforms like Reddit, or comment sections in places like Instagram/Facebook. It can be used as a flimsy excuse to take moderation actions when such actions aren’t necessary, which makes users trust that moderation team less I also don’t agree with the privacy angle since all content here is public by nature, but I do see value in discussing these other problems since that’s what this community is for? Also, while Rimu can defederate, letting people discuss it first is better. Best case scenario, the groups find some kind of compromise. Otherwise it lets people weigh in on the platform policies and federation status, instead of having admins make that call on their own
-
@artyom@piefed.social 2026-05-05 03:33
Defederating doesn’t solve the problem. Awareness might.
-
@db0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2026-05-05 06:33
Note that just because I’m an admin, I don’t do what I like. We explicitly reject the BDFL approach. Also you’re missing the objective of rimu here; it’s not to stop our admins from doing a specific thing, it’s to agitate other instances to defederate us widely.