Post #1925866
2026-05-02 23:28 UTC
Replies (7)
-
@Thumptastic3@mstdn.plus 2026-05-02 23:35
@jamesmarshall @benroyce @leaverou I looked it up. Cool!
-
@mattg@recurse.social 2026-05-03 03:37
@jamesmarshall @benroyce @leaverou yes but I'd even take being trichromatic...
-
@wynke@mendeddrum.org 2026-05-03 07:20
@jamesmarshall @benroyce @leaverou The 'but' would come down to 'but all of society and all the colour choices made by people are based on trichromatic vision, it might be harder to navigate that'.
-
@fxdm@mamot.fr 2026-05-03 09:04
@jamesmarshall @benroyce @leaverou Given my professional background (perversion) in evolutionary ecology, I can't help but wonder: OK, that sounds cool, but how much does this fancy feature costs in fitness ? I probably can't afford it...
-
@aiefel@mastodon.social 2026-05-03 17:03
@jamesmarshall @benroyce @leaverou do people with it get to see octarine?
-
@jamesmarshall@sfba.social 2026-05-02 23:30
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tetrachromacy
-
@ausgroucho@aus.social 2026-05-03 05:43
Its hard enough already setting the TV up to look good. So, that's a hard no from me.