Elektrine lite

← Feed

@fluidlogic@oldbytes.space

Post #1869306

2026-04-30 22:50 UTC

I try to understand sociotechnical systems and why they succeed or fail. Books like "From Whirlwind to MITRE: the R&D story of the SAGE Air Defense Computer" are very revealing about how a hugely expensive and risky research project can be brought to successful completion: among the factors are shit-tons of money, strong oversight and solid organisational backing thanks to a handful of key personal relationships. I'm currently reading "Genesis of the Jet: Frank Whittle and the Invention of the Jet Engine". The Brits could have had jet-powered aircraft in production a year or two before the outbreak of WWII, but despite Whittle being an RAF (British Air Force) insider and recognised as a genius engineer, his "Power Jets" company was continually starved for cash, had to deal with risk aversion and deep scepticism from RAF planners and delays caused by inappropriately skilled, recalcitrant contractors. (I'm convinced class and rank were a core part of the problem - Whittle was from a working-class background.) In 1941, after years of R&D engineering work, a functioning but non-flightworthy prototype jet engine was given to the American military. Thirteen months later they had reproduced the engine and were using it to power the first US-built, custom-designed jet aircraft, fully six months before the British, with their multi-year headstart. That's the next story to read.

Replies (4)

  • @fluidlogic@oldbytes.space 2026-04-30 22:52

    In March 1941, General Henry H. ‘Hap’ Arnold, Chief of Staff of the US Army Air Corps, was on a fact-finding mission in Britain and was astonished when, by chance, he learned that Whittle’s engine was about to fly. He was aware of British jet patents and after checking out the Whittle project he was convinced that the British invention could become the springboard for America’s entry into the Jet Age. He quickly made arrangements for Whittle’s W.1X engine to be shipped to the USA, and picked General Electric to build it under licence. In April he asked GE to send a good engineer to Britain to work with Colonel A. J. Lyon of the US Army Air Force in London. Within a few months contracts were signed between the British and US governments for rights to build the Whittle engine in the United States. On 1 October 1941 the W.1X disassembled to packing-case size, accompanied by a Power Jets team comprising Dan Walker, Flight Sergeant King and G. B. Buzzoni, was flown to Bolling Field, Washington, in the bomb bay of a Liberator. They arrived at GE’s works at Lynn, Massachusetts, on the 4th. The PJ team, huddled in the bomb bay, had been worried that the pilot might pull the wrong toggle and deposit them in the drink. Towards the end of the flight they were so cold they almost wished he would. Buzzoni, a very capable fitter, commented on landing that, “The first time I fly I have to fly the bloody Atlantic!” ' This was a little over 9 weeks before Pearl Harbor, so the US was not yet in the war. The US Government gave an undertaking that they would use the information for war purposes only. At the end of the war the UK Government released them from this undertaking for the magnificent sum of $800,000! Thus America received a virtually free passport into the field of aero gas turbines, entirely brought about by Whittle’s guts and determination to bring his project to fruition. The deal with America was indicative, and could not have come at a better time. There was some hard bargaining taking place between the two countries over lend-lease deals during this period, when America was neutral and Britain, fighting alone, desperately needed American arms. This reciprocal arrangement regarding the Whittle project was proof that Britain was in the forefront of a new aviation technology, which gave the country added status in American eyes just when she needed political and economic support in the USA. The Americans, by nature, wasted no time in tackling the jet project, which Arnold and the National Advisory Committee for Aeronautics considered to be of vital national importance. It was naturally a top secret project, and only a handful of people concerned knew what was going on. Arnold quickly decided that GE were the best company, because of their experience in steam turbine technology and in superchargers. Like Whittle, Arnold did not approach traditional piston-engine manufacturers, being convinced that they would be sceptical of such a radical and unorthodox development. In August 1941, about three months after the first flight of the E.28, GE received a contract to build 15 Whittle engines designated as Type I-A. Bell Aircraft, of Buffalo, New York, were selected to build three aeroplanes, to be powered by the I-A. The Americans were off to a good start, helped by Whittle and his associates. Only thirteen months after General Arnold’s historic Washington meeting, on 2 October 1942, the XP-59A Airacomet made its maiden flight — some six months before the British Meteor became airborne!

    Open ##1871568

  • @fluidlogic@oldbytes.space 2026-04-30 23:09

    Radar is another technology which the British pioneered and shared with the US. That story is told in "The Invention That Changed the World: How a Small Group of Radar Pioneers Won the Second World War and Launched a Technical Revolution". Again, the Americans had the resources to develop and bring to production this electronic wonder. (I read that book long ago - time for a re-read in the context of these other books.) Finally, also in the 1940s, the British had a lead in the technology of stored program electronic computers. It's tragic to read about the underfunded scrabbling that the team at NPL endured to build the Pilot ACE in the aftermath of the war, constrained by a shattered economy and rationing, and contrast it with the vast state (I mean nation state) resources that the Americans could throw at their first (stored program) computing projects, EDSAC and BINAC. That story is well told in "Alan Turing: The Enigma". #sociotechnicalsystems

    Open ##1871569

  • @clew@ecoevo.social 2026-05-01 22:01

    After a considerable history of working class inventors, yesno? Hmph. You might like _The Woman who Smashed Codes_, lots about organizational capacity and strategic unknowing @fluidlogic

    Open ##1871573

  • @amcewen@mastodon.me.uk 2026-05-02 17:13

    @fluidlogic have you read The Devil's Device by Edwyn Gray? That's a similar tale a couple of decades (IIRC) earlier when Robert Whitehead was developing the torpedo. It's a great read. He ended up going to Italy when the Royal Navy were dismissive.

    Open ##1891728