Post #1824036
2026-04-30 19:57 UTC
Replies (11)
-
@raganwald@social.bau-ha.us 2026-04-30 20:22
@joeinwynnewood@mstdn.social With respect to "radical" steps:
-
@joeinwynnewood@mstdn.social 2026-05-01 03:14
Replaced original link with gift link. Apologies for not using gift link in the first place.
-
@shsbxheb@mstdn.social 2026-04-30 20:33
@joeinwynnewood One could argue that SCOTUS is the Radical here and your solution is actually the Conservative one.
-
@vinh@mastodon.ie 2026-04-30 20:50
@joeinwynnewood https://curia.europa.eu/site/jcms/d2_5096/en/court-of-justice Members of the European 'supreme court'. Nobody in Europe knows their names.
-
@blamellors@mstdn.party 2026-04-30 21:26
@joeinwynnewood Expand the Court Democrats or we'll keep marching backwards
-
@Ponygirl@mastodon.social 2026-04-30 22:15
@joeinwynnewood The inmates are running the asylum.
-
@flipper@mastodonapp.uk 2026-04-30 23:01
@joeinwynnewood why stop at 13? Make it 50, 500... Dilute the power of these reactionary sock puppets.
-
@Nonya_Bidniss@infosec.exchange 2026-04-30 23:10
@joeinwynnewood Radical steps? No, rational steps.
-
@Flowermob@mastodon.social 2026-04-30 23:26
@joeinwynnewood the alternative is to vote in better representatives and reenact the voting rights law and just overrule the precedent
-
@peterfisherbooks@disabled.social 2026-05-01 00:58
@joeinwynnewood #expandscotus end #leachingoffbillionaires
-
@Remittancegirl@mstdn.social 2026-05-01 09:48
@joeinwynnewood I don't think it is radical at all. All those justices swore to be impartial. If they've broken their oaths, they need to be removed.