Post #1673881
2026-03-19 17:12 UTC
@webology @ehmatthes @wsvincent Ok fine, I'll jump in with a hot take 😅
I don't think it's unreasonable to anticipate anti-user patterns to emerge over the long term. (I think the GitHub/Msoft acquisition is a fair proxy--though OpenAI is a less stable company, which could accelerate enshittification)
In the near term, they will want to bank on user's goodwill and trust--so I don't see a lot of changes coming immediately. But it's highly possible/likely that intentions will change, whether it's through feature bloat, licensing changes, monetization, user privacy breaches, etc...
I'm glad for the developers. They've done great work, and I think it has been positive for the Python ecosystem.
It's notable, however, that at least on Masto, the overall response to this news is negative. OpenAI is not a trustworthy company... (not to anthropomorphize a company... so, rather, Altman and his sycophants exhibit questionable ethics and viewpoints, and their leadership can't be trusted...)
Replies (1)
-
@webology@mastodon.social 2026-03-19 17:24
@pythonbynight @ehmatthes @wsvincent Re: It's notable - I don't think it is. Mastodon is overly negative towards any AI/LLM related. I didn't see the rage on other platforms as I saw flexed here. I think Charlie and crew built a mountain of goodwill and moved Python forward. I'm willing to see what comes of it, or pull an Eric and switch to the next-best community fork, as he did with VS Code. Except I still think that product is hot garbage 🤣