Post #1640267
2026-04-19 08:57 UTC
Replies (4)
-
@kapellosaur@speedlines.stctp.zone 2026-04-19 09:00
@SevenDeadlyExes There would be more beauty in the world, for sure. For every person who is always happy to be the consumer, there's another who would be creating and putting things out into the world
-
@Natanox@chaos.social 2026-04-19 09:09
@SevenDeadlyExes Really depends whether the needs are met without *any* sort of human labour. Do you assume it's done by e.g. self-repairing robots, with zero human intervention? If not it would automatically necessitate stuff like advertising those 'jobs', and potentially give benefits for people who do it --> some people have to be paid more, etc. etc.
-
@mwt@mastodon.nz 2026-04-19 09:40
@SevenDeadlyExes Well for starters, everything that currently depends on volunteers to have time and resources would no longer have trouble finding volunteers. Families would be healthier and happier since not only would all their basic needs be met, so would all their other needs because everyone would have time to take care of each other. The environment would be healthier because of all the aforementioned volunteers that have time to go out there and plant all the trees and trap all the invasive pests and etc. There would be a lot more creative works (art, music, fiction, etc). The internet and tech world would be made up of open-source everything with excellent documentation.
-
@azteclady@kind.social 2026-04-19 11:39
@SevenDeadlyExes It would be a kinder world--a lot of meanness comes from fear of hunger, homelessness, violence. It would healthier--more people would be free to research food systems and esoteric areas of medicine and biology and physics and technology. More people would create/craft/make art, which would also make us happier and less stressed.