Post #1537885
2026-04-21 21:09 UTC
@davidak @forgejo @Codeberg disingenuous. They want some Github-specific features and to not have to deal with hosting infrastructure because they're developers not sysadmins/network engineers.
meanwhile Codeberg has had several DDoS/AI-crawler related outages. 4 months ago they were only hitting a 90% uptime... so I guess they're comparable to Github in that respect
but also it's hard to take their hosting infra seriously when they do stupid stuff like make their status page a subdomain of codeberg.org. This is a big nono, you always host your status page on a completely separate domain and ideally on a different Autonomous System
Replies (2)
-
@theraspb@aus.social 2026-04-21 21:24
@feld @davidak @forgejo @Codeberg Codeberg is a not-for-profit entity providing a free service and they're keeping with Microsoft's GitHub in terms of its uptime. calling this statement Disingenuous and blaming *them* for being *attacked* is victim blaming. They're doing incredible and the more attacks they defend the more they'll be able to strengthen their infra. I personally believe the main criticism of gitea not dogfooding is valid. if your software is so good, you should be using it in your community demonstrating that it's viable to host for others also.
-
@mark22k@layer8.space 2026-04-21 22:50
@feld @davidak @forgejo @Codeberg Codeberg's status page is hosted on a AS (with Hetzner).