Post #1502307
2026-04-21 19:56 UTC
Replies (6)
-
@Tinidril@midwest.social 2026-04-21 20:06
Cyber security in general is going to get interesting. Breaking into protected systems often requires more patience than expertise. Attackers often get detected when they take short cuts because of laziness and overconfidence. AI agents have unfathomable patience and attention to detail.l
-
@brucethemoose@lemmy.world 2026-04-21 20:04
It does seem advantageous to the defender. Another factor Mozilla didn’t mention (and that Anthropic wouldn’t like to emphasize) is that major LLMs are pretty similar. They use similar architectures and formats, train from the same data, distill each other, further pollute the internet with the same output and so on. So if (for example) Mozilla red teams with Mythos, it’s likely that other LLMs would find the same bugs instead of something new.
-
@nobody_1677@lemmy.world 2026-04-21 20:20
Not zero bugs, but it should help. A benefit for defenders is that they can use AI review on code before they make it public or release it in a stable release
-
@truthfultemporarily@feddit.org 2026-04-21 20:23
It is theoretically possible by using formal verification. Which is getting easier due to lean. But still impractical.
-
@panda_abyss@lemmy.ca 2026-04-21 20:35
You can achieve zero bugs through liberal use of rm.
-
@treadful@lemmy.zip 2026-04-22 01:39
Are we going to have safer software? Because not only defenders will have a powerful tool, but attackers too. Probably not safer software, but the window of time for a bug being known and exploitable will be shortened greatly. Instead of 0-days, we might have 0-minutes. That’s assuming these ridiculous AI systems are rolling deployments that fast, so maybe that idea’s nonsense.