Post #1446977
2026-04-09 12:36 UTC
@aardrian @SteveFaulkner I can only guess at the logic, but if I had to it would be along the lines of "once they're older than a month, they have no value". That this is not necessarily true is part of an ongoing conversation. We've achieved some recent advances, such as reinstating author accreditation on Vispero blog posts, but there is more discussion to be had on what place technical blog posts have on the new Vispero site. TBH, we haven't even started discussion about the Weekly Reading Lists. I personally appreciate your support and will do my best to advocate for a solution that meets indutsry expectations.
Replies (2)
-
@aardrian@toot.cafe 2026-04-09 12:43
@onsman It was short-sighted on their part. All the site changes in the last few years have felt very “ready, fire, aim.” It belies a certain lack of rigor in the organization, which is a signal to some folks how much their products and services can be trusted. Of course, I could just be grumpy to see yet another respectable accessibility consultancy turn into a hudge-/venture-funded money grap with no connection to the community it once championed. @SteveFaulkner
-
@SteveFaulkner@mastodon.social 2026-04-09 14:40
@onsman While I agree that some don't age well, others are very old but still include relevant info. I am also a little concerned that provenance on some has been nuked. Who wrote something is important to credibility of content @aardrian