Post #1240887
2025-10-06 16:32 UTC
@m @Mer__edith I've no doubt there would be exemptions planned but of course it gets complicated when one end is exempted but the other isn't. The non-exempt end sees both sides of the conversation so the exempt is exposed. I'm sure the automation would be told to ignore it but the attack vector is opened to other parties. Whenever there is a vector it will, at some point, be exploited.
Replies (1)
-
@m@thias.hellqui.st 2025-10-06 18:22
@b3lt3r I honestly, sadly, do not think they understand that. Most of them do not know what they are about to do, and/or the implications of it. Also, if others take the same route as Signal intends to do (just for clarification: which is a stance I applaud) there will be no one else to have a chat with for the politicians either, encrypted or not, unless they conjure up their own service. But that would also remove the “one end is un-encrypted” dilemma. @Mer__edith