#citations

71 posts · Last used 8d

Back to Timeline
petersuber @petersuber@fediscience.org · Aug 05, 2026
When #AI tools hallucinate citations, their made-up author names are not random. "We show that #LLMs do not merely default to high-probability individual names when generating fictional experts: they produce correlated character ensembles, pairs and trios [of co-authors] whose co-occurrence rates far exceed chance and are consistent across independent generations." https://arxiv.org/abs/2606.02184 They fool people and tools: "We identify 1,655 ghost-authored records claiming nonexistent journals with fabricated publication dates…Server-side #DataCite timestamps prove deliberate backdating…These carry real #DOIs…making them harvestable by any scholarly aggregator that ingests DOI metadata." #Citations #Hallucinations #ScholComm
19
0
22
petersuber @petersuber@fediscience.org · May 08, 2026

A new study in The Lancet shows that the rate of fake citations increased more than 12x between Jan 2023 and Feb 2026.
https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(26)00603-3/fulltext

276
24
361

You've seen all posts