From GP comment:
We really should replace wind turbines with solar panels and batteries, or some other method of storing the energy.
That’s wrong, wind can provide a steady energy source (you see that in the plot from the OP article), it is available during the night and, depending on geography, can match some energy demand quite well.
It is not competing, it is complementing each other in a way that less storage is needed.
For example, in coastal Northern Europe, there is lots of wind power in winter, when electricity is needed to power heat pumps.
California specifically has a long coast line exposed to west winds from the Pacific ocean.
Batteries complement these.
An ideal fourth complement would be wave power like the Pelamis type. (Pelamis was shelved by E.ON, a fossil energy company, but probably copied by the Chinese.)
Loading comments...
About Community
Discussion of climate, how it is changing, activism around that, the politics, and the energy systems change we need in order to stabilize things.
As a starting point, the burning of fossil fuels, and to a lesser extent deforestation and release of methane are responsible for the warming in recent decades:

How much each change to the atmosphere has warmed the world:

Recommended actions to cut greenhouse gas emissions in the near future:

Anti-science, inactivism, and unsupported conspiracy theories are not ok here.