My disagreement with your posture is your implied insistence that protecting children is the only goal of these proposed laws. The military example should have shown you that this is obviously not the main goal of these laws, but you seem to want to ignore this. Most ppl agree with protecting kids from mature content. This law(s) is framed in a way to be unenforceable, yet the laws are coming regardless. This would suggest there is another reason for the laws. How would the law work for new Linux server rollouts? Over 18 only, no learning Linux in school? Change working age laws so no under 18 can administer servers? Consent on every automated install? How would that work? If servers are excluded from the law, will ppl just use a server install and add a DE on them after? How do we validate who is actually at the keyboard? (Hint, you can’t) Are you seeing how unworkable this proposed law is yet? We don’t prevent kids from going into hardware stores that carry dangerous tools, we assume children are accompanied by a responsible adult. This is no different.