Just a curated sample of pictures that resonate with me and my current essence (two are pictures I personally drawn). This is the most "family-friendly" material I could curate from ten thousand pictures, photos and drawings across the phone gallery.

This is a kind of artistic content that could very easily end up loosely labeled "illegal, anti-democratic, false-fact or hateful". Does the previous statement sound too exaggerated and hyperbolic from my part? Think deeper about those pictures, what (and Who) are being described, what the underlying principles are, do some reverse search if you don't know about what's/who's being depicted in each of the pictures, and if you still got some apolitical perception of causality detached from the mundane, you'd realize how it could very easily be said to be "complicated" for "safety" and banned, prohibited, criminalized, forbidden from being expressed. I'm REALLY not exaggerating or doing some kind of victimization here, I really wish I were...

Fediverse is like the few places left where there's no christian fundamentalism (I wonder why the heck most pagan and occult practitioners still use Facebook, Instagram and X, when all those platforms end up amplifying the mainstream christianity). But then many secularists, seemingly the majority of the Fediverse userbase, end up behaving exactly or similarly to how fundamentalist christians do.

"Let's keep the fediverse safe and pleasure for all". I guess "safety" and "pleasure", at least in most people's subjective dictionary entry for "safe", wouldn't really have room for this kind of content, would they? And I didn't even include pictures with explicit snakes (in respect to people with ophidiophobia, just beware the Ouroboros from the second and third pictures, as well as the pair of snake-horns from the sixth picture) or explicit non-sexual nudity (as in Venus figurines, statue of Ereshkigal, etc; some pictures contain low-res depictions of breasts, namely the second and third pictures, too low-res to be really distinguished) in this curated list of images.

Oh, and I didn't even say about the ID requirement for online content as more and more countries are pushing down citizens throats, with online activity tied to ID, then suddenly mine and many other's physical identities could get concentric targets waiting for the next fundamentalist christian group willing to "exorcise the devil from the face of Earth because GOD ordered us to serve him and only him". Again, sounds too much or dramatic? A STATUE of Baphomet, privately owned by a Luciferian Quimbanda temple in Brazil, is still seized by AUTHORITIES for more than A YEAR, and WAITING FOR LEGAL DECISIONS to be "allowed" to be present in private rituals! THIS is what people end up defending whenever they advocate for "safety".