Japan protects children online very differently to the UK. (Shout out to red rose for the heads up - it was interesting.) While the UK Online Safety Act is driving biometric age verification and platform-based ID checks, Japan has taken another route: mobile carrier filtering enabled by default for under-18s, combined with parental control and digital literacy. There is no nationwide social media ban in Japan. Instead, age controls typically sit at the telecom/SIM registration layer rather than at individual platforms. In this video I explain: • Japan’s 2008 Youth Internet Environment framework • How mobile carriers determine age at SIM registration • Why filtering is enabled by default for minors • The parental opt-out (waiver) mechanism • The privacy trade-offs compared to UK-style age verification This isn’t “no regulation” — it’s a different regulatory architecture. Sources: Nippon.com – Overview of Japan’s youth internet law and filtering model www.nippon.com/en/in-depth/d01099/ Children and Families Agency (Japan) – Sixth Basic Plan outline (youth internet measures) www.cfa.go.jp/assets/contents/node/basic_page/fiel… NTT Docomo – “Request for Not Using Filtering Services” (waiver form example) www.docomo.ne.jp/english/binary/pdf/support/proced… The Japan Times – Commentary on social media regulation debate www.japantimes.co.jp/commentary/2024/11/28/japan/s… The Japan Times – Reporting on youth victims and social media concerns www.japantimes.co.jp/news/2026/02/27/japan/crime-l… If you’re following UK Online Safety Act developments, this comparison shows that “protecting children online” does not automatically require biometric ID checks across platforms — but every model comes with trade-offs. Let me know in the comments: would you prefer telecom-level filtering, or platform-based age verificatio

Are there any better countries we could use as examples in the future other than one where child porn and beastiality are still legal?