By its very function and definition, LLM 'AI' can only ever bring you up to a skill level of 'average at best' in a realm you're not skilled in. It is trained on the best and worst that has been fit to publish and it goes for the statistically most likely. So yes, if you suck at writing - it seems like it's a wordsmith. BUT If you're a skilled professional writer, it's simplistic and incapable. If you're not a professional developer, it seems like it's a great coder. BUT if you are someone who writes maintainable code, it puts out hot garbage. This absolutely aligns with the findings of C-Suite executives *loving* AI, middle managers waxing enthusiastic, and actual workers finding it useless. Most people aren't skilled writers, or artists or coders, or whatever - and by their very job role managers and executives don't work to produce usable output, they manage and and direct workers to.