@alexia @cwg1231 Please don’t use a proprietary software license. Entities that ignore human rights law are likely to also ignore copyright law, restrictions on use in copyright licenses simply should not exist (I think the FSF article explains this well), and if everyone puts different use restrictions we’re going to end up with thousands of slightly different possibly-incompatible licenses.

Also, that specific license doesn’t seem to have been reviewed by a lawyer. I noticed several problems (I am not a lawyer):
It appears be written in such a way that would prohibit even distributing the software on a physical medium (like a CD) for the cost of the physical medium.“No entity that commits such abuses or materially supports entities that do may use the Work for any reason.” seems overly broad and like it would prevent anyone who pays taxes (to a government which commits human rights abuses) from using the Work.
If you want to scare off companies, just use the AGPL. It’s a free software license and companies seem to be scared of it (Google doesn’t allow use of any AGPL software apparently)