In reply to
Eric Jennings
@HitokiriEric@defcon.social
Anecdote accepted. Snappy comeback not found.
defcon.social
Eric Jennings
@HitokiriEric@defcon.social
Anecdote accepted. Snappy comeback not found.
defcon.social
@HitokiriEric@defcon.social
·
2d ago
@codemonkeymike @coldclimate
Hmm… for the hardware firmware I’d still want to have to unlock it on device rather than having an attack surface/backdoor from the internet to exploit. Apple had the issue a couple years ago with thieves exploiting the remote password change to workaround the phone protections.
But I get how it sucks for this use case.
Like a lot of things, for 99% of users who don’t care they should default to a version that’s secure from most thieves but not totally secure from government and then let the users who really care opt in to the stronger lockdown mode.
View full thread on defcon.social
1
2
0
Conversation (2)
Showing 0 of 2 cached locally.
Syncing comments from the remote thread. 2 more replies are still loading.
Loading comments...