In reply to
Jamey Sharp
@jamey@toot.cat
An advocate of nuance and historical context "not the rockstar you want, but the janitor you need"
toot.cat
Jamey Sharp
@jamey@toot.cat
An advocate of nuance and historical context "not the rockstar you want, but the janitor you need"
toot.cat
@jamey@toot.cat
·
Mar 26, 2026
LLMs
Sensitive
@regehr@mastodon.social If we build tools that actually give us zero degrees of freedom, surely there are more efficient and reliable ways to use them than LLMs?
Given that, as you note, zero DOF is only aspirational, I would love to see more work along the lines of the Termite project for synthesizing device drivers. Version 1 took the provided constraints on the behavior of both the device and the OS, did a bunch of computation, and tried to spit out C source without human intervention. Termite 2 took the same inputs, but gave developers an IDE that would auto-complete large chunks when there were no valid alternatives, then prompt the programmer for the few decisions that were left. I think there are lessons I'd like to see more people learn there.
View full thread on toot.cat
5
0
0
Loading comments...