In reply to
Jamey Sharp
@jamey@toot.cat
An advocate of nuance and historical context "not the rockstar you want, but the janitor you need"
toot.cat
Jamey Sharp
@jamey@toot.cat
An advocate of nuance and historical context "not the rockstar you want, but the janitor you need"
toot.cat
@jamey@toot.cat
·
Mar 26, 2026
LLMs
Sensitive
@regehr@mastodon.social sure, I understand that distinction. like verifying an NP-Hard solution versus generating one, though I know you can tell me all about how these program verification tasks are themselves often NP-Hard. I just think it would be a shame to drop the existing research on program synthesis in favor of something that generates vaguely-guided random text in a long feedback loop. I mean if we really reach zero DOF, I think an existing coverage-guided fuzzer ought to give better results faster than an LLM
View full thread on toot.cat
2
0
0
Loading comments...