V.H. Belvadi
vhbelvadi@indieweb.social
<p>**Primary account on Bluesky:**<br /><a href="https://bsky.app/profile/vhbelvadi.com" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener" translate="no"><span class="invisible">https://</span><span class="">bsky.app/profile/vhbelvadi.com</span><span class="invisible"></span></a> Trinity Cambridge Researcher 2025 (PhD) • Gonville & Caius College, University of Cambridge • Academic account <span class="h-card" translate="no"><a href="https://indieweb.social/@vhbelvadi" class="u-url mention">@<span>vhbelvadi</span></a></span> Member: British Society for the History of Science • Institute of Physics ••• Photographer • FC Bayern • IndieWeb proponent ••• Research, essays and newsletter on the interconnections between science, technology and society. Subscribe below!</p>
Posts
-
Post #1086918
As one of the fourteen who answered @bbbhltz’s recent survey, I can now confess I was a light mode voter. I just find it easier to read in light mode even as other types of websites are better dark. Although I wasn’t the one who mentioned it in the survey, I’m fairly certain I too discovered Bobby’s blog through someone else’s site. I’m on the fence about octothorpes because the prefetch implementation throws a browser warning. (No click bait titles please.) https://bobbyhiltz.com/posts/2025...
-
Post #1086917
@bbbhltz Ah, at the moment I’m one of those single octothorpe sites. I set it up, loaded a page to check (which would’ve sent the octothorpe call) and then disassembled it because of the warnings. I’m guessing those other sites have a similar story behind them. I was pleasantly surprised with light mode users being the majority. While I don’t get fatigued, I find it harder to track lines in longer reads that are effortless in light mode. I keep losing my place or re-reading parts too often.
-
Post #1086915
Now that’s an interesting idea @lazcorp. I remember my first-ever webpage was hosted on my ISP’s subdomain too. I hadn’t thought of it like this but in hindsight it did help me get past the initial obstacles and get things set up with little fuss. And it often gets much easier the second time round of course. Thanks for your contribution to the #IndieWebCarnival https://thegoblin.market/@lazcorp/115725137785326676
-
Post #1086914
RE: https://islandinthenet.com/indieweb-2030/ What a great contribution from @khurtwilliams for this month’s #IndieWebCarnival – autonomy is fundamental and theme designers on large platforms like Wordpress adopting IndieWeb standards can make a substantial change, but the rest of us have to press for it. The path to a larger footprint for an open web, this essay argues, is wider adoption of standards not by the end user but by tool builders around the web. ‘Five years is both short and suffi...
-
Post #1086913
I cannot say enough great things about @readeck and I’m just waiting for some sort of note-making capability. This, from Olivier Meunier, was what really won me over: ‘There won&#39;t be any AI in Readeck, sorry. AI companies are currently on a mission of destroying labour, the environment, knowledge and every single website they crawl.’ Terrific. https://readeck.org/en/
-
Post #1086912
The #IndieWebCarnival is underway as always and there’s about a week left if you’d like to contribute to this month’s theme: share your thoughts on the future you see (or hope) for the #IndieWeb. More here: https://vhbelvadi.com/indieweb-carnival-future
-
Post #1086910
Thanks for your contribution, Jeff. I agree that by the strict definition of the term #IndieWeb most of us aren’t even on the IndieWeb. I too see it much more loosely, and in line with how you describe your own site: domain, hosting and a handful of pages. Can’t go wrong with that. https://mastodon.social/@wordius/115812874655213777
-
Post #1086909
Looking for something interesting to read today? Here’s a round up of all the entries from last month’s #IndieWebCarnival reflecting on where the #IndieWeb will be – or where we all want it to be – by 2030. https://vhbelvadi.com/indieweb-carnival-round-up-dec-2025