Josh "cortex" Millard
joshmillard@mastodon.social
<p>Makes art and stuff, used to run <a href="http://www.metafilter.com" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener" translate="no"><span class="invisible">http://www.</span><span class="">metafilter.com</span><span class="invisible"></span></a>. he/him, Portland, OR, USA. email at josh@joshmillard.com</p>
Posts
-
Post #4181403
With its gripping narrative of a man's struggles against mythological threats (barrels) and the whims of the gods (additional barrels) before finally ousting intruders (a large monkey) from his home and rejoining his beloved Penelope (Penelope), Donkey Kong is the 20th century's boldest and yet most popularly accessible treatment of Homer's Odyssey
-
Post #2478111
never skip vast and trunkless legs day
-
Post #2031173
mitosis is just a scam by Big Biology to cell more
-
Post #2003722
Not my circus, not my monkeys: good luck with all that My circus, my monkeys: I am running a successful monkey circus Not my circus, my monkeys: I am running a successful monkey-rental service My circus, not my monkeys: oh no, oh man
-
Post #1615587
the reason vampires are often so arrogant is they&#39;re incapable of self-reflection
-
Post #1482078
you tellin me there’s an entire faire dedicated to dressing up like a strung-out cartoon chihuahua
-
Post #1359787
RE: https://mastodon.social/@joshmillard/116427368888770395 nerd-sniped, Pizza Hut stained glass lamp edition
-
Post #911540
Couple new carves and test prints today, some more weird little guy action and also little a class war as a treat
-
Post #707464
I’m a cranky old-web person but I’m just genuinely fucking mystified that the reaction to either Jack’s or Zuck’s new corporate social media landgrab isn’t a loud unanimous laughing “no, get fucked”. Twitter and Facebook were a warning, not an instruction manual.
-
Post #633980
[finally picking up where I left off training steer to be assassins] guess who’s back on their bulls hit
-
Post #633979
TIRED: femme fatale WIRED: homina homina hominous
-
Post #633978
RE: https://mathstodon.xyz/@mjd/116201545705819330 that&#39;s the stuff baby
-
Post #633977
(If we don&#39;t control for symmetry on the n=3 specimens, we get the nine total that we see in Mark&#39;s set, the results of flipping some of these horizontally and or vertically.)
-
Post #596065
Fresh start on this this morning, from the little bit of rambling I did last night: Let&#39;s play with the question of how you can divide a square up into n sub-rectangles each of which has sides of a 2:1 ratio. The really simple case is n=2: we&#39;ll just fill up a square with two 2:1 rectangles, easy peasy!