← Feed

Posts

• Post #678765

  Exciting data summary from #chi2023 papers chair Julie Williamson to help interpret where your round 1 recommendations put you in relation to the whole set. Remember: Accept was not one of the threshold outcomes. Also: you dont have to make suggested changes, and can rebut issues. https://chi2023.acm.org/2022/11/09/chi-2023-quick-look-at-how-to-interpret-your-reviews/

• Post #678715

  @alarith awesome! Thanks for all this info 👍

• Post #678714

  Spring is here 🎉

• Post #678713

  Recapping my (terrible level) of German before #chi2023 Meanwhile when did @duolingo become an awful add ridden nightmare

• Post #678712

  interesting update of the week - ive been invited to give a keynote at a chemical engineering conference (?). Ive told them my speaker fee and minimum expense expectations. lets see what happens...

• Post #678711

  Consumer #Neurotechnology is arriving en masse. So what is Cognitive Personal Informatics? https://medium.com/@cogpi/cognitive-personal-informatics-4f86910624bc Ive been meaning to this for a while. After our #chi2022 discussion forum, we're planning a series of follow up posts and events. #cogpi #neurotech #neuroethics

• Post #678710

  all registered for #chi2023 🎉

• Post #678709

  Going to #CHI2023 ? New to reviewing? Want to review for #CHI2024 ? Dont forget to add this course to your registration. Here's a list of the afternoon's topics, before we critique example reviews. C16: How to Peer Review for CHI and Beyond https://chi2023.acm.org/for-authors/courses/accepted-courses/#C16

• Post #678708

  I run a meme-of-the-week open challenge for students to submit a meme that’s relevant to the weeks learning outcomes of my classes. Makes Mondays 5pm classes more fun. This got submitted this week… 🙃

• Post #678707

  Im super pleased to have just submitted a big grant proposal, with @Anna after a few months of awesome collaborative preparation. I also obviously hope it is also successful. But that seems an aside right now. 🎉🍻

• Post #678706

  Led by @CSchneegass, our #MobileHCI2023 workshop on Cognitive Personal Informatics has been accepted! Look out for a cfp coming next week - research about what wearables will track about our cognitive activity. For now you can read more here on the topic https://medium.com/@cogpi/cognitive-personal-informatics-4f86910624bc #cogpi

• Post #678705

  @mjskay interesting. I was told last years guidance told people that 8000 was the minimum that would be accepted. But thanks for the feedback

• Post #678704

  @andresmh and it looks like you were right :)

• Post #678703

  @andresmh yeah. But we have already gone past the normal growth level, ahead of the deadline. In terms of abstracts at least. We’ll see in terms of actual papers next week I guess.

• Post #678702

  @mjskay @chi it was introduced a couple of years ago after some people produced 30page+ response documents that reviewers and ACs complained about. What we want is the reasoning. And a track change version. Not a page of discussion about every change. It’s workload management. There was options for managing lengths limits and workloads I guess, but a limited space explanation was favoured.

• Post #678701

  @mjskay @chi someone would abuse it though and put 500 comments in the document

• Post #678700

  @mjskay @chi you’re looking for further ways to circumvent? Interesting strategy.

• Post #678699

  I’m not bothering with mastodon. I’m drmaxlwilson on bluesky.

• Post #678567

  Reminder tomorrow's CHIWORK weekly discussion is with Ayse Kucukyilmaz on how HRI is changing the future of work with robotics. Free community discussion, join us online 11:15am ET, 4:15pm UK, 10th Nov. https://www.chiwork.org/2022/11/03/chiwork-conversation-with-ayse-kucukyilmaz-hosted-by-max-wilson-at-1115-am-est/

• Post #671185

  Here's my analysis of reviews produced for #chi2023 and the review process in phase 1. tl/dr better reviews approach 1000 words, and 1/3 of papers are not producing reviews, 2/3 are not producing enough (!) https://chi2023.acm.org/2023/01/05/investigating-the-quality-of-reviews-reviewers-and-their-expertise-for-chi2023/