2026-09-28 23:29 UTC
The story says he makes 3 claims:
1. She wasn't arrested for the past-due $50, she was arrested for failing to appear in court...over the past-due $50.
Um...yeah, I don't think that makes you look any better. If anything it makes it worse as it means you've been hounding her over it for awhile.
Replies (1)
-
@charlesgaba.com@bsky.brid.gy 2026-09-28 23:31
2. The ad "frames" the arrest on the $50 instead of her "total" debts to Marshall...of $3,600 at 18% interest. Holy crap. Marshall was charging her 18% INTEREST??? Yeah, I'd call that "preying on low-income families."