2026-09-28 23:31 UTC
2. The ad "frames" the arrest on the $50 instead of her "total" debts to Marshall...of $3,600 at 18% interest.
Holy crap. Marshall was charging her 18% INTEREST???
Yeah, I'd call that "preying on low-income families."
Replies (1)
-
@charlesgaba.com@bsky.brid.gy 2026-09-28 23:33
3. The arrest "wasn't a surprise" given that she apparently was up to her ears in hock to a bunch of different businesses, was being evicted, etc. Those factors certainly make her look a lot less sympathetic...but she never said that she was "surprised" that she was being arrested.