Post by @alexchapman@vee.seedy.cc

@alexchapman@vee.seedy.cc

2026-09-28 22:00 UTC

@jzb@hachyderm.io Because there's not just random people with an LLM, there's people that know what they are doing, yet find it easier to have an agent do the manual task of writing the code. As I said, there are people that have difficulty doing the coding part, but the testing and the rest they can do without a problem. Its more nuanced than just random people using LLMs to generate code and then make PRs. The people at KDE did it right, no promoting LLMs, just good quality code regardless how it was written. @dansup@mastodon.social

Replies (3)

@jzb@hachyderm.io 2026-09-28 22:06

@alexchapman@vee.seedy.cc @dansup@mastodon.social how do I know which is which without having to review it? I don’t. I’ll say again: we got by just fine without LLMs this far. They’re not necessary, they’re not inevitable, and the negatives far outweigh any positives. People, being people, have choices. We can say “no.” People are saying no. Deal with it.

Open ##4888498
@MuhammadFreeSoftware@fosstodon.org 2026-09-29 05:26

@alexchapman@vee.seedy.cc @jzb@hachyderm.io @dansup@mastodon.social How about all the ethical concerns on ai, as well as the violation of copyright laws? Could you elaborate futher on why this "Ani-AI" sentiment is going to be "bad for society"?

Open ##5411170
@melroy@mastodon.melroy.org 2026-09-29 12:18

@alexchapman@vee.seedy.cc @jzb@hachyderm.io @dansup@mastodon.social facts. Not everybody is a vibe coder.

Open ##5411176