2023-01-19 19:33 UTC
Replies (11)
-
@irregulara@mstdn.social 2023-01-19 19:38
@acosta@mstdn.social Spam Aleako
-
@Pat@mastodon.world 2023-01-19 19:39
@acosta@mstdn.social they know
-
@scentedmeat@norcal.social 2023-01-19 19:41
@acosta@mstdn.social Weird 🤔
-
@9six7@mas.to 2023-01-19 19:41
@acosta@mstdn.social Don’t tell anyone but it was Alito.
-
@Mrs_Moore@mstdn.social 2023-01-19 19:49
@acosta@mstdn.social Meaning: SCOTUS is reluctant to admit who leaked the draft opinion.
-
@junecasagrande@mastodon.social 2023-01-19 19:41
@acosta@mstdn.social The conservatives on the court have destroyed its credibility. I mean, how can Gorsuch faithfully interpret the Constitution when he took his seat in direct defiance of both the letter and the spirit of the Constitution?
-
@msbellows@c.im 2023-01-19 20:10
@acosta@mstdn.social
-
@ke7yxz@mastodon.social 2023-01-19 20:40
@acosta@mstdn.social This is how they kill the investigation and bury the embarassment. This will likely be the last word; in the future, the response will simply be "go see the report we published back in 2023". #ProblemSolved
-
@BobMazatlan@convo.casa 2023-01-19 22:05
@acosta@mstdn.social Looks like Ginny Thomas got away with it. Pretty crafty criminal, she is.
-
@maximumjim@mastodon.social 2023-01-20 01:28
@acosta@mstdn.social Why can’t they admit it was #GinniThomas?
-
@DebR@mstdn.social 2023-01-20 16:02
@acosta@mstdn.social They know who leaked it. They just don’t want us to know, because it is one of them. Sam? Ginny? Clarence?