2026-09-29 01:53 UTC
@ifixcoinops@retro.social @whbboyd@infosec.exchange I think that bit of my original post is more-correct, although looking at it again I realize that it doesn't account for combinations where one flavor was repeated, which *is* quite a number of them (but then, they are less interesting because they have less flavor per flavor)
Edit: and the expression I gave does work out to what you have there, it really is that simple if you exclude combinations that include repeats (well, it's even simpler if you include repeats, but ANYWAY)
Replies (1)
-
@uep@timeloop.cafe 2026-09-29 01:55
@SnoopJ@hachyderm.io @ifixcoinops@retro.social I'll just leave this here. https://timeloop.cafe/@uep/117351439620571518