2026-07-23 11:19 UTC
If repo closing by #codeberg by force happened, it would be a major practical disaster. The uncertainty alone is damaging: users should not have to worry that a subjective “purist” judgment or an unreliable automated tool might destroy their workflow. Codeberg needs to manage this risk with exceptional clarity, due process, warnings, appeals, and safeguards against irreversible deletion. I would hope a freeze phase would be first then dialogue. BTW would gladly pay to be left alone. 2/2
Replies (1)
-
@janantos@f.cz 2026-07-23 14:05
@adingbatponder@fosstodon.org anyway, whatever, I have migrated my repos elsewhere, safety and calm sleep of mine is what matters. And their argument about excessive use if some projects is failure in their side, not having proper limits in place, I had anyway selfhosted CI/CD workers by myself there. And them saying that projects closely tight to LLM ecosystem, cryptocurrencies, etc is telling me this is not about preserving resources, thats someones militant feeling being in place, ok its their choice, every action have reaction and I have moved on, in few days I wont even remember.