2026-09-25 22:31 UTC
@petrillic@hachyderm.io @wendynather@infosec.exchange
i personally thought TUBA was the expedient choice but that wasn't how the IETF rolled.
Replies (1)
-
@petrillic@hachyderm.io 2026-09-25 22:35
@paul_ipv6@infosec.exchange @wendynather@infosec.exchange it was. And PIP (our proposal) was the super future looking. So they decided to go with a monstrosity composed of a bunch of different things none of which are wrong necessarily but which don’t tell a cohesive story. Combine that with the introduction of NAT and… well here we are 30 years later.