Post #918759
2026-03-20 13:10 UTC
Replies (2)
-
@p3ter@mastodon.social 2026-03-22 19:47
@linguistory@code4lib.social Unless you're actually handling sensitive data, which would attract hashcode-matching forged data, I'm not worried about cryptographic-requirements on the hash. For integrity checking. According to Reto K., mac seems to have hardware support for SHA - outspeeding MD5. Not so on PCs. On my notebook, MD5 is faster than CRC32, btw. (0,08 vs 0,136s)
-
@p3ter@mastodon.social 2026-03-22 19:49
@linguistory@code4lib.social periodicity of checks of data "on shelves" (#LTO?): Good question! Professionally, I'd say "it depends": Find a sweetspot which doesn't disrupt daily work, and a method which has a reasonable runtime (days regular, weeks is normal, months uncommon) Are you talking about data on shelves, or on a "nearline" backup copy on servers/HDDs? With LTO there's also the issue with Generations and drives...