@alyx_woodward@universeodon.com
Post #814869
2026-03-28 00:48 UTC
Replies (2)
-
@alyx_woodward@universeodon.com 2026-03-28 00:58
@lzg@mastodon.social @autonomousapps@mstdn.social this @anildash@me.dm dork burbles about having definite plans, but he's burbling in bad faith: the truth is that Mr. Dash-Dot-Com doesn't regard the fraudulent marketing of LLMs as a serious problem. I would guess that's where most #tech professionals stand: they've been willing already, for decades, to live with and prosper from a corporate technology sector that's normalized fraud and raising money via false promises. So, lacking any plans himself (beyond preserving a status quo in which he's comfortably placed) he mocks those who have a principled stance against fraudulent technology. Why? Where can any action possibly start, except with principled opposition? The people who insist the most loudly that opponents must have carefully worked-out plans before they can be taken seriously are bad-faith actors like @anildash@me.dm and other people who don't actually care that much whether LLMs are destructive and fraudulent.
-
@autonomousapps@mstdn.social 2026-03-28 01:27
@alyx_woodward@universeodon.com @lzg@mastodon.social @anildash@me.dm since "stochastic parrots" keeps coming up, maybe it's worth checking in on one of the originators of the term (a scientist, not just some random Internet commentator!) also ftr I believe the OG people in this thread at least are all operating in good faith, even though there are differences of opinion. there's no need for vitriol here https://dair-community.social/@emilymbender/116304103647077081