sustainable cities
2026-03-23 19:36 UTC
Replies (7)
-
@UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 2026-03-23 20:33
Okay, but point of order. Are there any poor people on that train? Cause if there's poors on the train, I'll take the $2B bumper-to-bumper concrete blasphemy instead.
-
@becausechemistry@piefed.social 2026-03-23 23:29
I think it’s possible to accept that, while a city without cars obviously preferable, the electrification of vehicles is still a net positive given the enormous inertia of car culture.
-
@huppakee@piefed.social 2026-03-23 22:31
I call fake, no smog anywhere in the first panel
-
@JoshuaFalken@lemmy.world 2026-03-23 19:53
I like the comparison between the two car dependent panels being the 'same picture' meme, though the electric one should have a few extra columns to support the weight. Otherwise, 15/15 comic.
-
@Flyzeyez@lemmy.world 2026-03-24 10:17
Depending on where you live in the world it's just not possible for some people to live in one of those idealist walkable cities do to systemic segregation. Can't afford to live there but that particular area still needs workers. This ideal community is reserved for a certain class of people.
-
@Grail@multiverse.soulism.net 2026-03-24 02:34
Electric bicycles are EVs. I dislike it when people say EV and they mean EC. It's mostly carbrains who do it.
-
@WanderingThoughts@europe.pub 2026-03-23 21:54
Looks more like an illustration of gentrification.