Post #617779
2026-03-10 21:31 UTC
Assuming I’m assuming the 282 unidentified dogs were all pitbulls is the most batshit strawman you could’ve taken away from what I said.
I don’t even know if “strawman” applies, though; you might be illiterate enough to actually read it that way. The obvious reading is that I was jokingly preempting you trying to use the 282 unidentified dogs to weasel your way into a “God of the gaps”-style argument to assert some bias against pitbulls in identification so major that it invalidates the argument.
Replies (1)
-
@dazzlingclitgame@lemmy.world 2026-03-10 21:35
I can only imagine the 282 unidentified dogs were those vicious golden retrievers. They come out of nowhere, and they’re gone before you know what bit you. They’re fucking bloodthirsty, man. Yeah, crazy how I read your sarcasm as insinuating those 282 unidentified dogs were pitbulls. Gee whiz, I wonder how I could have possibly come to that conclusion?