Post #613428

I don't like poor journalism and this time MIT really gets on my nerves. Grace Huckins wrote and I quote: "... denied an AI agent’s request to contribute to matplotlib..." ".... discover the agent had retaliated with a blog post" It phrased in a way to suggest the AI, as a tool, itself retaliate; but it is a human-led harassment utilising AI/LLM. A human opened the github account Rathbun, and prompted the AI (openclaw?) to retaliate with a blog post if a PR is rejected. It might even be a separate prompt after a human discovered that the PR was rejected. At the moment we can't tell - Unless a journalist find out the human account holder and interview him/her. This article looked like it didn't fact-check, didn't investigate, and simply copied from other mainstream tech journals. The "journalist" probably didn't even ask AI to check the capability of OpenClaw. #AI #LLM #openclaw #MIT #github #tech #journalism