Post #4416603

2026-08-06 12:05 UTC

@troed@swecyb.com @dangillmor@mastodon.social read it, thanks. the most thorough comment in it concludes the CMA covers this fully, no new framework needed, LLM involvement irrelevant. note the exact statute itself: s.3(5)(a) says doing an act includes causing an act to be done, and s.3(3) makes recklessness sufficient. the thread and law you pointed me to agrees with me and says you were wrong this whole time. looks like you agree with me now, if that was why you shared the link?

Replies (1)

@troed@swecyb.com 2026-08-06 12:32

@flyingpenguin@infosec.exchange One of the comments agree with you. Others agree with me. Are you able to withhold judgement on things where you aren't a domain expert and await clarity from the legal system or was the whole point with your initial reply to me to win an argument on teh Intarnetz? @dangillmor@mastodon.social

Open ##4423523