Post #4390573
2026-08-05 05:57 UTC
@mhoye@cosocial.ca @Ryan1729@mastodon.social
It can.
But I don't need to get that specific.
"Write a python script to run daily that goes to cloudwatch for the last day in account xyz in us-west-2, and give me a summary of failure modes for the top ten mentioned lambdas" mostly just works. And I didn't need to mess with pagination on cloudwatch or escaping or decoding or working out the jsonpath. And that prompt will work out-of-the-box 9 out of 10 times. And then I can say "good, extend that for all active regions" - and it just works.
Minutes instead of an hour of screwing around. Now I can spend my time on interesting, non-routine tasks.
The reality - jq users will know this - is that jq syntax is difficult and quirky and simple things are doable but complex things are difficult. Beyond a certain complexity - just go do python. It's easier to code and easier to read. But neither of them will understand from context when I say "include any tags that are relevant".
Replies (0)
No replies.