Post #4384464
2026-08-04 17:34 UTC
Replies (5)
-
@csstrowbridge@mastodon.social 2026-08-04 17:47
@Barbramon1@mas.to @Clutha@mastodon.scot "That number pales beside deaths caused by predatory house cats..." It's also lower than the number of birds killed by fossil fuel pollution.
-
@michaelgemar@cosocial.ca 2026-08-04 18:18
@Barbramon1@mas.to @Clutha@mastodon.scot Exactly! Opponents of wind power cite bird deaths, but a thousand times more birds are killed by house cats. And a similar huge number die from striking building windows. So while I’m all in favour of any way to mitigate bird deaths, those who cite these deaths as a reason to oppose wind power are being disingenuous.
-
@Clutha@mastodon.scot 2026-08-04 17:38
@Barbramon1@mas.to These are astonishing figures.
-
@clickhere@mastodon.ie 2026-08-04 18:31
@Barbramon1@mas.to Thank you for this and the above article. Off-topic, I know, but would you also have any recommendations re the figure on cats and bird deaths? (I've tried to search for a source before, but couldn't find one, and it's come up a few times here at home - cat and birb lover here at home in Ireland, too!) @Clutha@mastodon.scot
-
@raymaccarthy@mastodon.ie 2026-08-04 20:54
@Barbramon1@mas.to @Clutha@mastodon.scot Likely tall buildings are worse. The fossil fuel sockpuppets talk up wind turbine issues and lie about solar panels. They ignore batteries. One black blade isn't a big expense, especially on new installs.