Post #4383013
2026-08-04 20:56 UTC
Completely vibe-coded project it seems, even documentation. And yet:
Human-Origin Source License
Also love this:
You may not, without prior written permission from the Author:
- ship or maintain a modified version outside the contribution-purpose
rules;
- maintain a divergent private or internal fork;
- port, clone, rebrand, or recreate the Covered Software;
- create an API-compatible replacement, behavioral clone, competing
implementation, or Derivative Implementation; or
- use AI-assisted implementation mining to create, improve, test,
document, or validate a Derivative Implementation.
Look, I use AI too (mostly to speed things up by working on multiple items in parallel), but I’m not gonna stuff “human-origin source license” on anything I use it for, nor do I think creating API-compatible replacements, competing implementations, etc, should reasonably be possible to block with a license… Also, quite literally, he’s creating tools for reverse engineering, which in itself is generally in breach of the license of whatever software is being reverse engineered. Fuck off and use a FOSS license, whether it be permissive or copyleft…
Replies (3)
-
@qarbone@lemmy.world 2026-08-04 22:45
“No! Nuh uh! You can’t prompt Claude to do what it did for me, again! I did it first and called ‘dibs’ on ever doing it again!”
-
@Randelung@lemmy.world 2026-08-05 00:16
As if copyright even applied to this.
-
@purplemonkeymad@programming.dev 2026-08-05 06:35
Was it not ruled that API compatibility was not copyright infringement? (Oracle Vs Google.) I don’t think the last two are even enforceable.