Post #4279286
2026-06-19 18:27 UTC
https://lwn.net/Articles/1078707/i largely agree with the points raised in this thread that "sexual content is unsuitable for work". but i strongly disagree that merely a mention of the word sex (gay or otherwise) with no further context or specific innuendos constitutes "sexual content". my silly domain name is not unsuitable for a workplace in any way, shape, or form. the name doesn't matter. it's arbitrary. getting grossed out by the "sex" in my domain name is as silly as getting frightened by the "boo" in my username.
Replies (2)
-
@Transbian_Arsonists@catwithaclari.net 2026-07-31 12:07
@sodiboo@gaysex.cloud doesn't host pornographic materialsthat can be fixed - posted by Seraphine
-
@gettie@fedi.catto.garden 2026-06-19 18:30
@sodiboo@gaysex.cloud we need more decentralized dns infrastructure. and to abolish icann. fuck icann. :neocat_middlefinger_double: