Post #4258205
2026-07-30 23:54 UTC
@kini@maro.xyz @ikesau@micro.ikesau.co So then why should one be able to create an LLM that allows for terrorism AND the other non-dangerous things LLMs are helpful for?
This is like saying
making a bomb = bad very bad no go
But making a bomb that is very pretty and can be used also as a home decoration = good no liability
Most people who buy the bomb will use it as a decoration, but this doesn't mean that a bomb should be built
Replies (1)
-
@res260@infosec.exchange 2026-07-30 23:57
@kini@maro.xyz @ikesau@micro.ikesau.co if you build something that enables terrorism not through malice but through negligence, you should still be held responsible. The people making LLMs with no reinforcement-learning to lower possible harms are not doing it out of malice, they are doing it out of negligence