Post #4232388
2026-07-30 07:37 UTC
Replies (5)
-
@cygnathreadbare@retro.pizza 2026-07-30 15:20
@kopper@not-brain.d.on-t.work worst_person_you_know.jpg
-
@mega2223@exquisite.social 2026-07-30 15:08
@kopper@not-brain.d.on-t.work As they put it it's just a temporary policy due to the legal uncertainty of AI-generated code, given that it is standard Oracle policy to always make the most annoying decision about everything i don't think that this rule is going to stick when they come back to draft their final policy, unfortunately
-
@richlv@mastodon.social 2026-07-30 13:22
@kopper@not-brain.d.on-t.work And the FAQ is good, too! --- What are the risks to reviewer burden of using generative AI tools? Generative AI tools, by their nature, make it easy to create large quantities of plausible-looking code, with plausible-looking tests, which is nonetheless incorrect or, even if it is correct, is poorly designed and therefore difficult to maintain. Reviewing submissions of such code can easily become a drain on the already limited time of human reviewers.
-
@lianna@micro.webgarden.click 2026-07-30 10:01
@kopper@not-brain.d.on-t.work why wouldnt it?
-
@keithzg@fediverse.keithzg.ca 2026-07-30 09:05
@kopper@not-brain.d.on-t.work "The year is 2037. Java dominates web and app programming."