Post #4172820
2026-07-28 20:19 UTC
Replies (2)
-
@brianvastag@mas.to 2026-07-28 20:53
@kims@mas.to With enough purity tests, no one would have anyone left in their life. Does ANYONE live a pure life? Never shops at an evil corporation, never listens to anything by someone with wonky opinions, never clicks on a site that does harm? Purity tests divide people.
-
@muddle@infosec.exchange 2026-07-29 01:20
@kims@mas.to I was reading a guardian article recently... here it is https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2026/jul/23/anton-jager-groundbreaking-book-being-devoured-by-left The main thing I picked up from it is that "politicisation" goes through cycles and that we're currently in a stage where people are turned off from it. Not sure if I agree with that, but whatever. I kind of laugh at the mention of purity tests. Practically anyone who uses the phrase (yourself excluded, I think) uses it as a way to discredit other people. "Gatekeeping" also comes up a lot, and again, I laugh, because many (but not all) the people using it as a pejorative are basically fascist-adjacent or fascist-curious. Anyway, I loathe substack, but I loathe Meta even more. Rather than thinking about it in terms of purity tests or gatekeeping, my thing is "why is there a middleman?" Isn't that the common enemy? We should seize the means of communication as much as the means of production. #DoesThisMakeMeACommie