Post #4170773
2026-07-28 18:32 UTC
Replies (5)
-
@sharkfie@infosec.exchange 2026-07-28 18:38
@cwebber@social.coop @bremner@mathstodon.xyz I am very impressed by your turn around and deciding not to be left behind
-
@leifur@the.bisexuals.town 2026-07-28 18:41
@cwebber@social.coop @bremner@mathstodon.xyz the sarcasm might not be super obvious to those who aren't aware of the context, because the LLM boosters really do talk this way.
-
@foolishowl@social.coop 2026-07-28 18:46
@cwebber@social.coop @bremner@mathstodon.xyz I'm confused and my head hurts. But that's consistent with my previous experiences with Guix.
-
@Mae@is.badat.dev 2026-07-28 18:54
@cwebber@social.coop @bremner@mathstodon.xyz please use a tone indicator next time, Im stupid 😭
-
@cwebber@social.coop 2026-07-29 15:06
Well, it's been a day, time to break the kayfabe. Yes, the *pro-LLM* Guix Consensus Document is satire, as is the prior "review" I gave of it. But the issue at hand is serious, so here is me explaining the joke: https://codeberg.org/guix/guix-consensus-documents/pulls/14#issuecomment-20264173