Post #4141798
2026-07-27 16:17 UTC
"Despite over $40 billion invested globally, Carbon Capture and Storage (CCS) captures and stores less than 0.1% of annual global CO2 emissions, raising serious questions about its efficacy as a climate solution. ... case studies expose recurring patterns of cost overruns, suboptimal capture rates, geological uncertainties, and public liability transfer."
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2096249525000973
#FossilFuels #ClimateCrisis #CdnPoli
Replies (1)
-
@evdelen@mstdn.ca 2026-07-27 16:39
@harold@mastodon.social I'm reminded of the CCS projects that have come online, none has managed to capture more carbon than they have themselves produced. Just one example: https://www.cnbc.com/2022/01/24/shell-ccs-facility-in-canada-emits-more-than-it-captures-study-says.html