Post #4068262

Replies (1)

• @zer0unplanned@friendica.rogueproject.org 2026-07-24 17:20

  @sun@shitposter.world @mrsaturday@shitposter.world @wolf480pl@mstdn.io @phnt@fluffytail.org @multiversal_gangstalker@poa.st @cjd@pkteerium.xyz @p@fsebugoutzone.org @Suzu@detroitriotcity.com @rees@tsundere.love @SilverDeth@fsebugoutzone.org @npc@fsebugoutzone.org In science, a claim is only considered a "proven fact" or "reality" if it can be physically tested, measured, and verified by independent observers using modern technology. Because the stone is sacred and protected by a silver frame, no scientist has ever been allowed to take a sample or run a definitive test (like carbon dating or spectral analysis) to confirm it is a meteorite. Therefore, when scientists say it is "speculation," they are not denying the Islamic history or calling it a lie; they are simply admitting that without physical testing, they cannot scientifically certify it as a meteorite. Many geologists actually lean towards it being agate or basalt based on visual inspection of the fragments, while others support the meteorite theory based on historical context and iridium levels in local sand. The lack of scientific testing does not disprove the Islamic narrative; it simply means the scientific community cannot classify it as a confirmed meteorite without data. The "true history" you refer to is preserved in Islamic texts and belief, which stands independently of scientific validation. You really do not want to see the truth.

  Open ##4068460