@zer0unplanned@friendica.rogueproject.org

Post #4068460

2026-07-24 17:20 UTC

@sun@shitposter.world @mrsaturday@shitposter.world @wolf480pl@mstdn.io @phnt@fluffytail.org @multiversal_gangstalker@poa.st @cjd@pkteerium.xyz @p@fsebugoutzone.org @Suzu@detroitriotcity.com @rees@tsundere.love @SilverDeth@fsebugoutzone.org @npc@fsebugoutzone.org In science, a claim is only considered a "proven fact" or "reality" if it can be physically tested, measured, and verified by independent observers using modern technology. Because the stone is sacred and protected by a silver frame, no scientist has ever been allowed to take a sample or run a definitive test (like carbon dating or spectral analysis) to confirm it is a meteorite. Therefore, when scientists say it is "speculation," they are not denying the Islamic history or calling it a lie; they are simply admitting that without physical testing, they cannot scientifically certify it as a meteorite. Many geologists actually lean towards it being agate or basalt based on visual inspection of the fragments, while others support the meteorite theory based on historical context and iridium levels in local sand. The lack of scientific testing does not disprove the Islamic narrative; it simply means the scientific community cannot classify it as a confirmed meteorite without data. The "true history" you refer to is preserved in Islamic texts and belief, which stands independently of scientific validation. You really do not want to see the truth.

Replies (1)

@zer0unplanned@friendica.rogueproject.org 2026-07-24 17:22

@sun@shitposter.world @mrsaturday@shitposter.world @wolf480pl@mstdn.io @phnt@fluffytail.org @multiversal_gangstalker@poa.st @cjd@pkteerium.xyz @p@fsebugoutzone.org @Suzu@detroitriotcity.com @rees@tsundere.love @SilverDeth@fsebugoutzone.org @npc@fsebugoutzone.org While there are strong theories and historical accounts supporting the idea that the Black Stone is a meteorite, there is currently no definitive scientific proof because the stone has never been analyzed with modern techniques. The "proofs" often cited are actually hypotheses based on indirect evidence: Iridium Levels: Geologists found high levels of iridium (a metal common in meteorites) in sand samples near the Kaaba, which supports the meteorite theory proposed by Paul Partsch in 1857. Historical Accounts: Some records describe the stone floating in water (which would rule out dense rocks like basalt but fit with porous volcanic glass or pumice) and local legends of it "falling from the sky." Visual Inspection: In 1974, scientists Robert Dietz and John McHone, along with an anonymous Arab geologist, examined the stone and observed diffusion banding, leading them to conclude it is likely agate (a terrestrial rock), not a meteorite. Other analyses suggest it could be basalt or obsidian. Because the stone is sacred, fragmented, and sealed in a silver frame, no scientist has ever been permitted to take a sample or perform non-destructive testing (like X-ray fluorescence) to confirm its composition. Therefore, while the meteorite theory is popular and aligns with the tradition of it coming from "heaven," it remains a strong probability rather than a scientifically verified fact. The Islamic belief that it is from Paradise stands on faith, independent of geological classification.

Open ##4068482